Your health advisor. Your most trusted partner.

Why does the American Heart Association oppose restricting food stamps for junk food? The "Food Industry Interest Network" and Public Health Truths Every Hong Kong Resident Should Know

Dr. Eric Berg reveals a shocking incident: the American Heart Association ( AHA ) actually opposed a bill aimed at restricting low-income individuals from using food stamps ( SNAP ) to purchase junk food such as soft drinks, candy, and chips. This action involves a vast network of vested interests and warrants serious consideration.

Come check out the most popular digestive enzyme tablets ! product

👉🏻 : https://iherb.prf.hn/l/AJbWaRg/

High quality doesn't have to be expensive! Over a hundred iHerb products are up to 25% off compared to other stores, and with lightning-fast 8-hour delivery!

The most popular item purchased with food vouchers was surprisingly soft drinks.

The United States spends a significant amount on food stamp subsidies for soft drinks each year. $ 10 billion
Soft drinks contain high-fructose corn syrup , which can lead to fatty liver, high blood pressure, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
Result: Taxpayers subsidize the source of the disease

From soft drinks to pharmaceuticals: A complete profit chain

Government-subsidized corn → production of cheap syrup
The food industry manufactures junk food and sells it at low prices to low-income groups.
The government is subsidizing food stamps again to help consumers buy junk food .
Consumers who fall ill turn to drug treatment
Big Pharma profits from chronic disease treatments

American Heart Association Conflict of Interest

AHA opposes bill restricting junk food → Reason surprisingly: "Fears of impacting participation rate"
AHA receives substantial funding from the food industry, including Pepsi and General Mills .
Cereal products can obtain the "Heart Health Certification" mark for a fee.
Even with the same sugar content, some grains have labeling, while others do not — the standards differ, which resembles a commercial practice.

Opposition on social media: It turns out the post was paid for.

The food industry pays influencers over [amount missing] per post $ 1,000 , opposition bill
Slogans included "Freedom to choose food" and "Food is unsafe."
In reality, it's about manipulating public opinion to maintain profits from junk food.

The subsidy system has deteriorated.

The subsidies were originally intended to help farmers (starting with the Great Depression).
It has now evolved into funding the production of junk food → making the food industry richer.
taxpayer equals Pay twice : once for raw materials, and once for consumption.

In conclusion: Don't assume the system is "failed" anymore; it's actually "the system is functioning too well."

The system isn't broken; it's functioning perfectly — but it's not designed for you . Starting today, a nutritionally dense diet, policy support that benefits public health, and a clear understanding of the food industry's profit network will lay a solid foundation for your health!

Don't be trapped by the misconception that "free choice equals healthy choice." Only by knowing how to discern, how to refuse, and how to speak up can you achieve true health!